Transcript
9. CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS:
[Handwritten response, underlined:] States none
10. INTERVIEWING OFFICER'S COMMENTS:
[Handwritten response, underlined:] Photo of p/appl. [primary applicant] is very good likeness. He is Fully European. Wife however, is much darker than photo, and is [the words ‘in face’ are crossed out] Fully N/E (Indian). A very well presented, pleasant, intelligent couple who have Fluent English.
Have regular contact with P/Appl's [primary applicant’s] relatives (aunt & cousin) in Australia and have quite a good idea of what to expect.
In my opinion they would represent a good migration gain.
11. ASSESSMENT OF FAMILY: Group [Handwritten] 2.
[Five typed grades: 'Fails to meet standards', 'Barely meets standards but acceptable', 'Meets standards’, '(Above standards)', 'Well above standards'. 'Above standards' has been circled.]
12. RECOMMENDATION:
Acceptance recommended / not recommended. [Not recommended has been crossed out.]
[Illegible handwritten signature] Interviewing Officer
[Handwritten date:] 1/10/1968
13. APPROVED / NOT APPROVED [Blank space for signature; blank space for date.]
Related themes
Need help with your research?
Learn how to interpret primary sources, use our collection and more.